Restless? Go Climb a Tree
-
Medicating Children for
Being Children
by Wendy Priesnitz
 Often fidgets with hands or feet or squirms in seat; often leaves
seat in classroom or in other situations in which remaining seated is
expected; often runs about or climbs excessively in situations in which
it is inappropriate; often has difficulty playing or engaging in leisure
activities quietly; is often “on the go”; often talks excessively.
Sound like the kids you know? Then those kids “must” be mentally ill,
because that is the definition of hyperactivity found in the American
Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders (DSM). If you read it closely, the definition is
laden with words that are judgmental, or at least reflect an adult’s –
often a teacher’s – preference for quiet and order. And, although
hyperactivity and its ilk are referred to as “learning disabilities,”
these characteristics seem not really to get in the way of true
learning. Rather, they might describe the normally active, curious
child!
By some estimates, the number of American
children diagnosed with hyperactivity and other “problems” such as
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is upwards of five
million. In 2013, the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said that 11
percent of American children of school age had been diagnosed with ADHD,
which amounts to 6.4 million children. That was a 42 percent increase
since 2003. Boys are disagnosed at twice the rate of girls
Some doctors and parents have found that many of the behaviors
falling under the Psychiatric Association’s various definitions
of childhood mental disorders can be caused by allergies
to certain foods, food additives or environmental factors, or by
poor nutrition. Studies and clinical trials conducted at
Purdue University in the U.S. and Surrey and Oxford in the
U.K. indicate that ADHD, dyslexia, and dyspraxia (Clumsy
Child Syndrome) may have a nutritional basis.
However, the pharmaceutical industry, which manufactures
stimulants like Ritalin, Dexedrine, Adderall, Vyvanse, and Concerta to medicate these so-called
illnesses, has a vested interest in helping doctors diagnose and
treat them. ADHD drugs are a worth more than ten billion dollars anually
to manufacturers. Their marketing is powerful, and an estimated
two-thirds of kids diagnosed with ADHD are prescribed drugs to control
their supposed problem.
A survey conducted by the Harris polling company
for Eli Lilly and Company found that parents report their children
have ADHD “symptoms” around the clock but physicians
only treat many of their patients for symptoms during school
hours. So the push is apparently on to educate doctors about parents’
“need” for further drugging of their children.
“Managing ADHD during school is important, but we cannot
overlook that managing ADHD during family time plays a
critical role as well,” said Richard W. Geller, M.D. of Norwich
Pediatric Group, Norwich, Conn., and an assistant clinical professor
of pediatrics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine,
commenting on the survey results.
Fortunately, an increasing number of doctors and researchers
would disagree with Dr. Geller and, using a more nuanced approach, have been coming out
against the acroos-the-board psychopharmaceutical approach to the behavioral
management of children, i.e. redefining normal but inconvenient
childhood behavior as a mental disorder.
Priscilla Alderson, Professor of Childhood Studies at London
University, told The Times newspaper quite plainly
that legitimate syndromes such as attention deficit disorder was being exploited by psychologists keen to make a
quick buck. Some life learning parents would agree with her; there is a great
deal of anecdotal evidence that when diagnosed kids leave school, its
environment, and behavioral expectations for home-based learning their “symptoms” disappear.
Other families find that some children’s and attention span improves with
dietary changes.
Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD has been an adult and child neurologist,
in private practice, for over 40 years. He views the “epidemic”
of ADHD. with increasing alarm. Dr. Baughman describes
it this way, “[Psychiatry] made a list of the most
common symptoms of emotional discomfiture of children; those
which bother teachers and parents most, and in a stroke that
could not be more devoid of science or Hippocratic motive,
termed them a ‘disease.’ Twenty five years of research, not deserving
of the term ‘research,’ has failed to validate
ADD/ADHD as a disease.”
In addition to scientific articles that have appeared in leading
national and international medical journals, Dr. Baughman has
testified for victimized parents and children in ADHD/Ritalin
legal cases, writes for the print media and appears on talk radio
shows, always making the point that ADHD is a creation of what he calls the
“psychiatric-pharmaceutical cartel,” without which they would
have little reason to prescribe its drugs.
Ned Hallowell, a psychiatrist and author of the
books Driven to Distraction and Delivered from Distraction,
says, simply, “We are pathologizing boyhood.” (He, by the way, is
pro-medication for those who really need it to deal with a real
problem.)
There is also evidence that some ADHD-type
behavior is a result of the demands of school not being in synch with
the behavioral stages of young boys. A huge 2012 study, entitled
“Influence of Relative Age on Diagnosis and Treatment of
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children” and published in
the Canadian Medical Association Journal, looked at one million children
between the ages of six and 12. The results reflected a pattern set up
by kindergarten enrollment procedures, which allow children to enroll in
kindergarten in September if they turn five by the end of that calendar
year; those turning five in January and beyond must wait until the
following September. The researchers found that boys who were born in
December (and therefore the youngest students in their class) were 30
percent more likely to receive a diagnosis of ADHD, and 41 percent more
likely to be medicated, than boys born in January, who were a full year
older.
While ADHD is a valid diagnosis, it has been
watered down to include children who are just immature or
developmentally different from what is required by the
sit-down-and-listen style of classroom education. Dr. Allen Frances,
professor emeritus at Duke University School of Medicine, says that the
ADHD diagnosis has become so common that it is meaningless. It is now “a
disease called childhood,” he says.
Ultimately, whether or not to accept a diagnosis
of ADHD and then whether or not to fill a prescription for a drug to
manage that behavior, is up to individual parents. There are many
questions to be asked. For instance: Can the behavior in question be
seen as a benefit rather than a deficit? (Check out the work of Howard
Glasser, and his book Transforming the Difficult Child.) Are
the side effects of the stimulants acceptable? Is it necessary for any
particular family to have their child behave in the way a given school
requires?
Lucky are those whose parents can help them avoid
the behavioral demands of the classroom by facilitating life learning!
Wendy Priesnitz is the founder and editor of Life Learning Magazine, a well known
home-based learning advocate since the 1970s, the mother of two adult daughters who learned without school, and the author of 13 books. This article was published in 2004
and updated in 2019.
Copyright
© 2002 - 2023 Life Media
Privacy Policy
|
